After the conference last week, I’ve been pretty busy, but earlier on in the week my Shorter (and Better) Half pointed out a couple of negative posts online (they weren’t on blogs, because blogs – like this one – encourage interaction by using a comments section and making contact easy). The bulk of them seem to come from Senator Rónán Mullen, who sent out a press release protesting the conference (if anyone can get a copy of that press release I’d appreciate seeing it, for curiosity sake). The two pieces I’m looking at are from The Iona Institutes website – one boo-hoo-ing the EU support and the other complaining about the limitations of the study.
First thing is first – Rónán and the Iona Institute: This conference was not about promoting gay adoption. I realised that’s the easiest thing for you to cling on to, because it’s really, really easy to be simplistic about it and scare people with the idea of gay and lesbian people adopting children, but the conference wasn’t about that. I’ll talk slowly and try to make this clear:
The conference was to launch the report, which look at the opinions and experiences of a group of children of lesbian and gay parents.
Not. Gay. Adoption.
The main focus of the conference was on us and the report. Honestly. If you weren’t there, I’m very disappointed. It was open for registration, there’s no reason why you weren’t there.
There were different perspectives on solutions to the problems we’re facing at the moment. The idea of accepting that your homophobia-inspired opposition to proposal such as the Civil Partnership Act, civil marriage for lesbian and gay people and the right to be considered for adoption for lesbian and gay parents is having a negative impact on children is probably too hard for you to swallow though, so you can conveniently ignore it.
Second – We know there were only 11 people in the study. I was there. We pointed this out. We all encouraged further research in Ireland in this area. Don’t talk to me about the limitations of small-scale qualitative research – I love that shit and can pick holes in weak research fairly easily.
The Iona Institute fail to point to other research, on larger groups over a longitudinal scale, in the UK and the US however. Cherry-picking, that’s called. Also, this line struck me as poignant: “Four were born by sperm donation and have no contact with their fathers.”. Yeah, funny, I’m one of them. It is my choice that I have not had contact with the man who donated sperm to my mothers.
Anyway. Comments section below is you agree or disagree. Honestly, the opposition to this is so banal and repetitive. The evidence is that gay and lesbian parents do a great job at raising children who are well-balanced on an emotional, social and whatever else scale. That’s the goal – getting parents who do a good job.
Doesn’t make a damn bit of difference what their gender and sexuality is.

